Prediction of Cedric Pioline vs Jakob Hlasek Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Pioline vs J. Hlasek

Cedric Pioline
FRA
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
2
Win
6
Played
4
Win
56
Age
61
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
118
Best Rank
7
6
Total Titles
5
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Jakob Hlasek
SUI
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
2
Win
6
Played
4
Win
56
Age
61
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
118
Best Rank
7
6
Total Titles
5
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Pioline 2 - 4 Hlasek
They have played 17 sets in total, with Cedric Pioline winning 7 and Jakob Hlasek winning 10. The last match between Jakob Hlasek and Cedric Pioline was at the Grand Slam Cup, 02-12-1996, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Jakob Hlasek getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pioline | 2 |
| Hlasek | 4 |
Last 6 H2H Matches:
(R1) Grand Slam Cup(12-02-96)
Jakob Hlasek
2
6
6
Cedric Pioline
6
3
4
(R1) Zagreb(01-29-96)
Cedric Pioline
6
5
6
Jakob Hlasek
2
7
3
(R2) Halle(06-13-94)
Jakob Hlasek
6
6
Cedric Pioline
3
1
C. Pioline vs J. Hlasek H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.25% (400-324) | Career Total W/L | 56.90% (429-325) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Grass | 1 |
| 0 | Hard | 2 |
| 1 | Indoor | 1 |
| 5 | Titles | 6 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 4 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Pioline vs J. Hlasek Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cedric Pioline has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jakob Hlasek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cedric Pioline, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jakob Hlasek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cedric Pioline has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jakob Hlasek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cedric Pioline has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jakob Hlasek winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cedric Pioline has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 36/23), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 107/98). Jakob Hlasek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 153/112), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 9/11).
- Player level: In the last year, Cedric Pioline has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jakob Hlasek has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Cedric Pioline winning 2 times and Jakob Hlasek being victorious 4 times. They have played 17 sets in total, with Cedric Pioline winning 7 and Jakob Hlasek winning 10.
- The last match between Cedric Pioline and Jakob Hlasek was at the Grand Slam Cup, 02-12-1996, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Jakob Hlasek getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cedric Pioline and Jakob Hlasek have played a deciding set 3 times, with Cedric Pioline winning 1 times and Jakob Hlasek 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Cedric Pioline winning 1, and Jakob Hlasek 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cedric Pioline has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jakob Hlasek has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cedric Pioline has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jakob Hlasek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cedric Pioline has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jakob Hlasek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cedric Pioline vs Jakob Hlasek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Pioline vs J. Hlasek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 4 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 10 |
| 80 | Games Won | 88 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 20% (1/5) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 80% (4/5) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (2/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 50% (2/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/4) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Pioline 0%, Hlasek 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Pioline 0%, Hlasek 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Pioline 0%, Hlasek 0%.
C. Pioline Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 2-6 6-0 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 5-7 6-1 | ||
J. Hlasek Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | W | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(6) 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||

C. Pioline vs J. Hlasek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.25% (400/324) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.90% (429/325) |
| 54.45% (1047/876) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.67% (1072/889) |
| 51.42% (9716/9178) | Games Win/Loss | 51.70% (9962/9308) |
| 52.20% (107/98) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.74% (153/112) |
| 54.46% (122/102) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.00% (99/81) |
| 57.53% (126/93) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.51% (141/100) |
| 59.21% (45/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 52.94% (36/32) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 285.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 260.88 |
| 61.29% (76/48) | Slam W/L | 53.33% (56/49) |
| 51.35% (76/72) | Masters W/L | 56.80% (71/54) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Cups W/L | 70.83% (17/7) |
| 55.31% (224/181) | Main Tour W/L | 56.80% (263/200) |
| 57.69% (15/11) | Challenger W/L | 58.33% (14/10) |
| 54% (311/578) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (345/604) |
| 61% (85/139) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 55% (81/146) |
| 54% (155/285) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (77/156) |
| 49% (129/264) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (132/232) |
| 84% (382/319) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (397/347) |
| 16% (382/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (397/49) |
| 23% (342/79) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (355/80) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:20 AM 15/11/25
Prediction05:35 AM 15/11/25
Prediction08:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction02:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction04:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Zverev Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Shelton H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
16:00
H2H 0-1
07:10
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal